Netflix has yet to comment on the technical issues during its first foray into the world of live sports. Netflix viewers around the world taking to Facebook, Threads and Twitter to express their concerns and frustrations about the live stream either failing or being poor quality. “Haters will say it’s fake, but Jake just outboxed Iron Mike! #Respect”, a fan posted on Facebook. One particularly viral video showed Tyson nearly taking his trainer’s head off with a devastating hook, reminiscent of his prime years. This clip alone garnered millions of views and reignited discussions about Tyson’s legendary power.
A Decade & Green Jacket Later, Rory McIlroy Returns To The Australian Open
Just four months later, Fox — then another fledgling network looking for some heat — aired Tyson vs. Buster Mathis Jr. Though it offered even less suspense than the McNeeley fight, 43 million people tuned in. In other words, now that the game is live streaming, it’s no surprise Netflix wants in.
Under a post showing the fight’s highlights, one top comment read, “I’ve seen better acting in low-budget movies. This was clearly staged for Netflix views”. This sentiment was echoed in thousands of similar comments across various posts. ESPN boxing analyst and former world champion Timothy Bradley Jr. focused on the technical aspects of the fight. “For a fighter of his jake paul vs chavez calibre, even at 58, to lose these fundamental skills overnight is highly suspect”.
- {
- This trend might lead to a bifurcation in boxing, with traditional competitive bouts existing alongside more entertainment-focused events.
- Netflix has teamed up with the Paul-owned Most Valuable Promotions (MVP) to broadcast a heavyweight exhibition bout, set to capture the attention of sports enthusiasts around the globe.
- However, it’s worth noting that Netflix’s involvement also brought some positives to the table.
- Ticket prices are ranging from $87 to $2,260 for ringside seats and there will be interest in how many people turn up for the fight.
- In the case of the Paul-Tyson fight, some observers noted shifts in the betting lines that didn’t seem to align with public sentiment or typical patterns for boxing matches.
- Under a post showing the fight’s highlights, one top comment read, “I’ve seen better acting in low-budget movies. This was clearly staged for Netflix views”.
|}
{
|}
{
|}
FULL FIGHT CARD
How to watch tonight’s boxing match?
Watch live fights, behind-the-scenes boxing content and more with an ESPN+ subscription. Sign up today.
The term ‘carnival fight’ has been used by critics to describe matches that are more about entertainment value than competitive integrity. By choosing to stream the Paul-Tyson fight, Netflix arguably positioned itself as a promoter of such events, potentially setting a precedent for future boxing content on the platform. More recently, exhibition fights have seen a resurgence, often featuring retired champions or celebrities. Floyd Mayweather Jr., one of boxing’s all-time greats, has participated in several high-profile exhibition bouts since his retirement from professional competition. His 2021 fight against YouTuber Logan Paul (Jake Paul’s brother) drew both massive viewership and criticism, with many questioning its legitimacy as a sporting event.
{
Jake Paul & Mike Tyson Fight Breaks Netflix, Breaks Boxing Fans’ Hearts
|}
This trend might lead to a bifurcation in boxing, with traditional competitive bouts existing alongside more entertainment-focused events. The age gap between the two fighters – a staggering 31 years – immediately raised questions about the fairness and competitiveness of the match. Many boxing purists argued that this bout was more spectacle than sport, a sentiment echoed across social media platforms and boxing forums.
Leave A Reply